no offense but im so tired of this being a wolfhome discussion.
literally all people want are circles on chests whether theyre flat or not. theyre not wanting to put all 9 yards of the nipple being erect, stray hairs, the lil braille pieces they just want to add the areola while its still part of the nipple its literally just a discolored part of the boob why is it a big deal
if you wanna get to the pg13 side of things then why are any of the art or poses here even allowed to be naked in the first place. even if the animals could talk and could stand on two legs, they generally kept their animal appearance if they were to be naked (regular show, we bare bears, donald duck). all cartoons i can think of where animals took a more human appearance where they do here, they all wore clothes (brandy & mr. whiskers, arthur (granted this is rated g but still fits under my argument), zootopia, robin hood, goofy). there are some cases that they wear clothes and dont cover everything up like chester cheetah and tony the tiger but theyre CLEARLY in a highly cartoon-y style and we are more realistic here.
theres little to no new traffic here or on chat so i actually genuinely doubt karen is going to give a shit. the aim of this website has matured whether underdog or anybody else wanted it or not.
if yall wont budge, add a warning during registration that explicitly states the usage of nipples here if allowed. do yall not remember the pounce/play mating play?? rofl what parent wants to see their kids pouncing or playing another user to "mate" smh. why not trial an all nipples for a week or so and then discuss where to go from there? most likely nobody, not even children, will abuse it. they might be like O.O at first but when they learn nobody else gives a shit they probably wont either.
anyway im still in support of all or none.